I watched this documentary last night called the beautiful losers. If you haven’t heard of it, its about these rebel artists who change from graffiti artists to established artists who do alot of work for advertisements and the media. They also opened their own gallery and basically tried to, in their terms, “make it without any help of the art institutions.” I thought it was interesting in terms of what we talked about in class yesterday…they started out a punk street kids and were all about the rebellion, yet they ended up in pepsi adds. They basically said they just wanted to get their work seen, so they stopped caring about the anti-institution vibe. None-the-less, they became a part of the controlled art establishments they started out hating. just wanted to reiterate the circle!
practitioners
commentary
links
- 'Bout What I Sees
- …might be good
- AAAARG.ORG
- Alliance of Artist Communities
- Art Lies
- Big Red & Shiny
- Cablegram
- Clusterflock
- Daily Serving
- Design Is Kinky
- Glasstire
- O Empire Wide And Glorious
- Res Artis
- St. Edwards University
- The Center For Land Use Interpretation
- The Museum of Jurassic Technology
- Up Like Toast
archive
categories
tags
animation
appropriation
Architecture
buildings
caption
captioning
class-projects
collaboration
color
community
conceptual art
contemporary
context
dettmer
doodle
Drawing
encyclopedias
event
first aid
folding
human
images
installation
knowledge
LeWitt
light
liquid
mapping
matta-clark
miniature
Modernism
museum
New york city
paper
people
picture
Postmodernism
Process
quotation
recaptioning appropriation bible stories
sampling
Sound
space
Video
your face

its great stuff.
A lot of people seem to be trying to make it without the art institutions.
To me that says something